The U.S. Environmental safety Agency and U.S. division of Transportation unveiled a plan nowadays that likely will lead to new restrictions on automobile exhaust.

And just when it felt safe to buy fuel at lower than $3 per gallon Muffler Tail Pipe .

The agencies said they will begin building tougher greenhouse gas and fuel economy specifications for passenger cars and vans built in 2017 via 2025, which "will build on the success of the initial period of the nationwide program covering cars from model many years 2012-2016."

The EPA and DOT's nationwide Highway Traffic Safety management in April announced that they cranked fuel economy specifications up to about 34.1 mpg for the combined industry-wide fleet for model year 2016 China Universal Muffler. Starting in 2012, automakers should improve overall mileage and emissions by about five percent a year.

The information product is the fact that specifications could accomplish as high as 62 mpg by 2025, but that's if and only if the auto industry makes improvements of six percent a year. EPA's report provided a range among 47 to 62 mpg in 2025 "if the industry achieved all of the increases via fuel economy improvements."

"Continuing the successful thoroughly clean cars program will accelerate the environmental benefits, health protections and thoroughly clean technologies advances more than the long-term," said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson inside a statement.

The idea would be to reduce the country's addiction to oil. A noble goal. Jackson also said the measure also is intended to encourage automakers to innovate.

Few particulars were provided. The measure follows directives issued in could possibly to propose additional rigid regulations on the nation's gas-guzzling fleet of passenger cars and trucks. The effort entails the California Air Resources Board to produce a technical assessment.

An updated analysis of possible future specifications is expected by Nov. 30 after agencies conduct further tests and meetings to determine an "appropriate" amount of standards.

At the time of the EPA's release of the new fuel economy standards, Jeremy Korzeniewski of Autoblog Green placed it in perspective. "Naturally, all with this is planning to price some extra dough," he wrote. "If the Feds are right, automakers will spend $51.5 billion more than the up coming five many years putting the specifications into effect as nicely as the average selling price of a brand new car will rise by $985 by 2016."

However, he also said fuel savings will placed an extra $3,000 in consumers' pockets more than the existence of the vehicle.

The question I have is simple. What about more mature cars? A rough search of opinions online turned up a quantity of perspectives. Some believe regulators feel that most more mature rolling stock shall be scrapped and replaced. That's understandable.

However, there's a large contingent that restores older rigs. Emissions controls are pricey and tough to apply to more mature models, not to mention how they can be overall performance killers. I did read one article from a classic car restorer who championed the utilization of some modern advances.